<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for To Be Continued...</title>
	<atom:link href="http://continuationism.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://continuationism.com</link>
	<description>The Work and Gifts of the Holy Spirit Today</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 04:59:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New Book on Modern Day Apostles by The Rock of Northwest Arkansas</title>
		<link>http://continuationism.com/2011/10/27/new-book-on-modern-day-apostles/#comment-1385</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Rock of Northwest Arkansas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 04:59:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://continuationism.com/?p=1231#comment-1385</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think there are tens of thousands of people who operate fully in the apostolic anointing today as church planters and ministers who are truly leading (fathering). They just don&#039;t use the title &quot;apostle&quot;. Do we really need the title for the Holy Spirit to operate fully through these people?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think there are tens of thousands of people who operate fully in the apostolic anointing today as church planters and ministers who are truly leading (fathering). They just don&#8217;t use the title &#8220;apostle&#8221;. Do we really need the title for the Holy Spirit to operate fully through these people?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How Firm a Foundation is the Argument from Ephesians 2:20? by ScottL</title>
		<link>http://continuationism.com/2012/01/12/how-firm-a-foundation-is-the-argument-from-ephesians-220/#comment-1381</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ScottL]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 20:50:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://continuationism.com/?p=1266#comment-1381</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Only if CMP agrees. ;)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only if CMP agrees. <img src='http://s1.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How Firm a Foundation is the Argument from Ephesians 2:20? by asphaleia</title>
		<link>http://continuationism.com/2012/01/12/how-firm-a-foundation-is-the-argument-from-ephesians-220/#comment-1372</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[asphaleia]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 10:20:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://continuationism.com/?p=1266#comment-1372</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Richard, in fact you are correct. Grudem did not retract that argument at all. Merely mentions Wallace&#039;s objection. I definitely remembered that wrong. Thanks for calling that to my attention, because I&#039;ve been saying that and I&#039;m sure I&#039;d&#039;ve kept on saying it. I&#039;m going to edit the post. So your comment will reflect my older wording, but hopefully the post will be factual at that point. Thanks again.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard, in fact you are correct. Grudem did not retract that argument at all. Merely mentions Wallace&#8217;s objection. I definitely remembered that wrong. Thanks for calling that to my attention, because I&#8217;ve been saying that and I&#8217;m sure I&#8217;d've kept on saying it. I&#8217;m going to edit the post. So your comment will reflect my older wording, but hopefully the post will be factual at that point. Thanks again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How Firm a Foundation is the Argument from Ephesians 2:20? by asphaleia</title>
		<link>http://continuationism.com/2012/01/12/how-firm-a-foundation-is-the-argument-from-ephesians-220/#comment-1371</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[asphaleia]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 15:12:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://continuationism.com/?p=1266#comment-1371</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think we should just declare you an apostle and submit and get it over with.
;-}]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think we should just declare you an apostle and submit and get it over with.<br />
;-}</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How Firm a Foundation is the Argument from Ephesians 2:20? by ScottL</title>
		<link>http://continuationism.com/2012/01/12/how-firm-a-foundation-is-the-argument-from-ephesians-220/#comment-1370</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ScottL]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 11:53:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://continuationism.com/?p=1266#comment-1370</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There he is, my blogging colleague!

At least something is now present that is more interesting than apostles today!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There he is, my blogging colleague!</p>
<p>At least something is now present that is more interesting than apostles today!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

