One argument that seems to arise from the side of cessationists is that church history records that signs, wonders, miracles and healings ceased soon after the first century and with the formation of the New Testament canon. We have noted in the past that such a view cannot be faithfully established from a biblical-theological perspective. But what does history attest to?
We see this in certain words of the early church father, John Chrysostom (AD 347-407):
‘This whole place is very obscure: but the obscurity is produced by our ignorance of the facts referred to and by their cessation, being such as then used to occur but now no longer take place. And why do they not happen now? Why look now, the cause too of the obscurity hath produced us again another question: namely, why did they then happen, and now do so no more?’ (Homilies on First Corinthians. Homily XXIX, 1)
More evidence to support the cessationist case is shown through such words of Augustine (AD 354-430):
‘In the earliest times, “the Holy Ghost fell upon them that believed: and they spake with tongues,” which they had not learned, “as the Spirit gave them utterance.” These were signs adapted to the time. For there behooved to be that betokening of the Holy Spirit in all tongues, to shew that the Gospel of God was to run through all tongues over the whole earth. That thing was done for a betokening, and it passed away.’ (Ten Homilies on the First Epistle of John. Homily VI, 10)
Finally, confessions of faith such as the Westminster Confession of Faith make this statement in its opening section on the Holy Scripture:
‘Therefore it pleased the Lord, at sundry times, and in divers manners, to reveal Himself, and to declare that His will unto His Church; and afterwards, for the better preserving and propagating of the truth, and for the more sure establishment and comfort of the Church against the corruption of the flesh, and the malice of Satan and of the world, to commit the same wholly unto writing; which maketh the Holy Scripture to be most necessary; those former ways of God’s revealing His will unto His people being now ceased.’
And, no doubt, there are other church fathers and variable sources that could be quoted in support of cessationism.
Thus, the argument goes that signs and wonders, miracles and healings, as well as other such things as prophecy and tongues, were only given in the time of the first apostles to authenticate their message, since the gospel and apostolic writings of Scripture were not yet complete. But, with the completion of the canon of Scripture by John (the apostle), and with these writings later being compiled into the New Testament, there was no longer any need for such gifts. Not only that, but cessationists then go on to support their argument by showing that the church fathers testified that such gifts of the Spirit had ceased, proving they were only for a limited time of authenticating the gospel message.
Yet, the story cannot stop there. We cannot find ourselves quoting a few church fathers as solid evidence for the ceasing of such gifts. Most cessationists, if not all, would claim that the history argument is not 100% evidence against the continuation of the gifts of the Spirit, signs and wonders. But many will, no doubt, be ready to use such to support the cessationist view.
Therefore, let’s take a moment to consider the words of some other church fathers and their specific thoughts about the gifts of the Spirit, specifically miracles, healings, prophecy and tongues. Below are four church fathers in particular:
Justin Martyr (approx. AD 100-165)
‘Therefore, just as God did not inflict His anger on account of those seven thousand men, even so He has now neither yet inflicted judgment, nor does inflict it, knowing that daily some [of you] are becoming disciples in the name of Christ, and quitting the path of error; who are also receiving gifts, each as he is worthy, illumined through the name of this Christ. For one receives the spirit of understanding, another of counsel, another of strength, another of healing, another of foreknowledge, another of teaching, and another of the fear of God.’ (Dialogue with Trypho, ch.39)
‘For the prophetical gifts remain with us, even to the present time. And hence you ought to understand that [the gifts] formerly among your nation have been transferred to us. And just as there were false prophets contemporaneous with your holy prophets, so are there now many false teachers amongst us, of whom our Lord forewarned us to beware; so that in no respect are we deficient, since we know that He foreknew all that would happen to us after His resurrection from the dead and ascension to heaven.’ (Dialogue with Trypho, ch.39)
Irenaeus (approx. AD 120-202)
‘Wherefore, also, those who are in truth His disciples, receiving grace from Him, do in His name perform [miracles], so as to promote the welfare of other men, according to the gift which each one has received from Him. For some do certainly and truly drive out devils, so that those who have thus been cleansed from evil spirits frequently both believe [in Christ], and join themselves to the Church. Others have foreknowledge of things to come: they see visions, and utter prophetic expressions. Others still, heal the sick by laying their hands upon them, and they are made whole. Yea, moreover, as I have said, the dead even have been raised up, and remained among us for many years. And what shall I more say? It is not possible to name the number of the gifts which the Church, [scattered] throughout the whole world, has received from God, in the name of Jesus Christ, who was crucified under Pontius Pilate, and which she exerts day by day for the benefit of the Gentiles, neither practising deception upon any, nor taking any reward from them [on account of such miraculous interpositions]. For as she has received freely from God, freely also does she minister [to others]. (Against Heresies, Book 2, ch.32, 4)
‘Nor does she [the church] perform anything by means of angelic invocations, or by incantations, or by any other wicked curious art; but, directing her prayers to the Lord, who made all things, in a pure, sincere, and straightforward spirit, and calling upon the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, she has been accustomed to work miracles for the advantage of mankind, and not to lead them into error.’ (Against Heresies, Book 2, ch.32, 5)
‘In like manner we do also hear many brethren in the church, who possess prophetic gifts, and who through the Spirit speak all kinds of languages, and bring to light for the general benefit the hidden things of men, and declare the mysteries of God, whom also the apostle terms “spiritual,” they being spiritual because they partake of the Spirit…’ (Against Heresies, Book 5, ch.6, 1)
Novatian (approx. AD 210-280)
‘…they [the first disciples] were henceforth armed and strengthened by the same Spirit, having in themselves the gifts which this same Spirit distributes, and appropriates to the Church, the spouse of Christ, as her ornaments. This is He who places prophets in the Church, instructs teachers, directs tongues, gives powers and healings, does wonderful works, offers discrimination of spirits, affords powers of government, suggests counsels, and orders and arranges whatever other gifts there are of charismata; and thus make the Lord’s Church everywhere, and in all, perfected and completed.’ (A Treatise of Novatian Concerning the Trinity, ch.29)
Gregory Neocaesarea (AD 213-270)
Consider these words from church historian, Justo Gonzalez, as he chronicles some of the things that took place in the life of Gregory Neocaesarea.
‘The most famous of these workers of miracles was Gregory Thaumaturgus – a name that means “wonderworker.” He was from the region of Pontus, and had been converted through the learned witness of Origen. But upon returning to Pontus and becoming bishop of Neocaesarea, his great evangelistic success was due, not to his theological arguments, but to the miracles that he was said to perform. These were mostly miracles of healing, but we are also told that he could control the course of a river in flood, and that the apostles and the Virgin appeared to him and guided his work.’ (Gonzalez, The Story of Christianity, Volume 1: The Early Church to the Dawn of the Reformation, p99)
In his book, Evangelism in the Early Church, Michael Green quotes an early church source, The Apostolic Constitutions, making note of the charismata gifts:
‘A passage in the Apostolic Constitutions crystallizes the point well: ‘These gifts were first bestowed upon us, the apostles, when we were about to preach the gospel to every creature, and afterwards were necessarily provided to those who had come to faith through our agency, not for the advantage of those who perform them, but for the conviction of the unbelievers, that those whom the word did not persuade the power of signs might put to shame.’ The charismata given in the apostolic age [first century] had not been revoked: they continued in the Church in the third century.’ (Green, Evangelism in the Early Church, p270)
Finally, it would be interesting to read some of Augustine’s words near the end of his life. Though many cessationists might look to quote him as a pointer towards a more cessationist view in the early church, as was shown in the beginning of this article, what we don’t realise is that Augustine actually had a change of theology near the end of his life.
Michael Green specifically points to his own study of the early church fathers as a reason why he shifted away from a more hard cessationist view, and he quotes these words of Augustine in his own reflections.
‘I am encouraged, in my recantation [from his hard cessationist thoughts in his earlier edition of this book], to be in the good company of Augustine who, in his earlier writings, believed that the charismatic gifts had died out in the Church and were no longer needed. But by the time he wrote The City of God, however, he had realized his scepticism was unwarranted. In Book 22 he tells how he changed his mind “once I realized how many miracles were occurring in our day…It is only two years ago that the keeping of records was begun here in Hippo, and already, at this writing, we have nearly seventy attested miracles.”‘ (Green, Evangelism in the Early Church, p271)
To read more about the changes in Augustine’s theology, one should read City of God, Book 22, Ch. 8, which is specifically subtitled, Of Miracles Which Were Wrought that the World Might Believe in Christ, and Which Have Not Ceased Since the World Believed. Now, what one will notice is that Augustine specifically refers to healings and miracles that happened through relics, which evangelicals have tended to not agree with such a practise.
So the words of Augustine will be challenging to many evangelicals. I am personally not closed to such, not so much to utilise Augustine’s comments to bolster my own theology, but for knowing how things in biblical times were not always done within our prescribed framework: Jesus had a spitting ministry at times with healing (see Mark’s Gospel), Isaiah walked around naked for quite a while (see Isaiah 20:1-3), Elisha’s bones raised a man (see 2 Kings 13:14-21), handkerchiefs and aprons that had touched Paul were used for healing (see Acts 19:11-12). And, if we will pay attention, we will see God has been doing things ‘outside the box’ from creation until now.
Interesting and challenging, not always fitting in OUR boxes to say the least.
Therefore, church history does not unequivocally support cessationism. No doubt there were some cessationists, but there were also quite a few continuationists.
In the end, the Scripture stands as the starting point for forming our theology. Still, it is interesting to study history, since our faith has been walked out over thousands of years. We are not alone in this. And, with such a consideration of history, we have seen that, in all probability, God never ceased in displaying His glory and power through signs, wonders, miracles, healings, prophecy and other various spiritual gifts.
To end, I point out one other resource that might be of great interest to those who would like to study about the charismata of 1 Corinthians 12 throughout church history. It is Ronald Kidd’s Charismatic Gifts in the Early Church. I have not yet had the opportunity to read it, but it was suggested in another book on the charismatic gifts, which was written by a friend of mine.
Pingback: Tweets that mention The Charismata In Church History « To Be Continued… -- Topsy.com
Good work. I’m encouraged at what you all are doing. I’ve written something similar on the gifts of the Spirit NOT being confined to the early church (http://reformedandreforming.org/2009/10/24/holes-in-the-bucket-why-the-absence-and-disparity-in-the-quality-of-the-gifts-of-the-spirit-today-does-not-disprove-their-continuation/).
I’m beginning to think that many – at least in the Reformed Tradition – look more to B.B. Warfield than John Calvin and Augustine.
Besides, Calvin himself didn’t maintain a staunch cessationist position and was open to their existence in his day (http://reformedandreforming.org/2010/03/16/op-ed-did-john-calvin-acknowledge-the-continuation-of-the-gifts-of-the-spirit/)
Pingback: Why I Am Not a Cessationist « Near Emmaus: Christ and Text
Pingback: Sunday Thoughts – 5/16 | The Church of Jesus Christ
Scott, this is good work you are doing together with Marvin. I’m encouraged that you have put this blog together to speak on the charismata from a historical and continuationist perspective.
There are so many early church fathers who spoke on the spiritual gifts as if they were still in existence at least into the 3rd and 4th centuries. You probably know this already, but than these four, there’s also Ignatius, Barnabas, Athenagoras, Shepherd of Hermas, and of Tertullian of Carthage who left the Montanist sect.
Pingback: Sunday Thoughts – 5/16 | Christian Articles and videos
Jesse – feel free to email an article to post on continuationism.com if you would so like. It can be one from your blog.
Kevin – Thanks for the comment. Yes, there are probably many more fathers to quote, with 5 or 6 being there to help with our thinking about history and the charismata. Keep in touch here.
Thanks for all these contrasting quotes, esp. on Augustine’s change of mind.
Now it depends on whether a person quote early Augustine or the later Augustine, the City of God one. 😉
Pingback: Another Reason Why the Historical Absence of the Spiritual Gifts Does Not Mean They Have Ceased « Reformed and Reforming
Pingback: Is That What History Really Teaches Us? (Response to CMP, part 5) « To Be Continued…
Pingback: Another Reason Why the Historical Absence of the Spiritual Gifts Does Not Mean They Have Ceased « To Be Continued…
You might be interested in a post I just did on Chrysostom. In his homilies on the Psalms, he appears to espouse a different understanding of miracles, thought I may just be reading the Greek wrong!
Good post, Alex. Interesting since most people like to quote Chrysostom to support cessationism. I have not read him personally, so don’t know of that particular homily, and I cannot seem to find his homilies on the Psalms in this online catalogue of the church fathers. But quite interesting to consider that. I wonder if the quote at the very beginning of this article, from his homilies on 1 Corinthians, has more to do with tongues than all the gifts. Just a thought.
That could be the case, or perhaps he changed his mind on the issue. The problem is don’t know which homilies were written first! I’ve also heard that Augustine changed his mind late in life from a cessationist position but I can’t remember the evidence for that.
Regarding his Psalms homilies, they were only recently translated into English and were not included in the set you linked too. There are a ton of works, even by the more well known fathers, that have simply not been translated! Eusebius of Caesarea’s Psalms commentary has never been fully translated. There’s definitely a wealth of evidence out there, but lots is still unavailable unfortunately. Hopefully I’ll help to remedy that some day ;-).
It’s in my article above. 😉
Fantastic! Now I don’t have to hunt that link down, though I did reveal that I only skimmed the blog post…
Next time I need to look more carefully before commenting!
Thanks very much though :-).
Pingback: More on the Fathers and the Charismata « The Poulos Blog
Hey, it happens to us all. 🙂
And thanks for the link here in your new article.
Pingback: Final Response to Patton’s “Why I’m Not Charismatic” (Part 8) « To Be Continued…
Pingback: Introduction to the Gifts of the Spirit | To Be Continued…
Pingback: Seven Reasons Why I Believe the Gifts of the Spirit Still Exist Today | To Be Continued…
Pingback: The Charismata in the Fathers (Intro) « Revival Culture
The quotes that you posted about the gifts continuing all are dated prior to the bible coming together as one complete testimony of 66 Books in the 4th Century. Do you have any valid quotes from those after the Counsel of Nicaea? I am on the fence here. I came out of Charismania and embraced Reformed Theology. It does appear that history shows that after the completed cannon those gifts did cease as Chrysostom and Augustine claimed. When you study the history of the Charismatic Movement and Azusa Street it is hard to embrace the movement with all the false teaching, ungodly practices, bad theology, etc. And the fact that for the most part of Church History these gifts did cease.
I would like to see more evidence later than third century.
Thanks for commenting. There are a few points worth considering:
1) As far as I can tell, most cessationists argue that these “sign” or “miraculous” gifts ended soon after the NT canon was completed. Now, it might be semantics, but though we must look at a later date for the affirmation of a Christian canon, the canon of Scripture was finished sometime between the late AD 60’s and AD 100 (depending on how you accept dates). So, soon after the completion of the canon would not seem to point to 300 years later, would it? Above in my article, we are looking at quotes well into the late 3rd century, also noting that Augustine lived into the 5th century (remember, he changed his perspective). Thus, noting things continued for another few hundred years after the canon was finished, it’s worth considering that the arguing of this point seems not as valid as first thought.
2) Even if one wanted to emphasize that the affirmation of the canon in the 4th century is the date to truly point to in regards to when the gifts would cease is the affirmation of the canon, you have to deal with something like what we read from Augustine whose view change later in his life. He attests to these gifts well into the 5th century.
3) On the point of canon affirmation, we then have to ask which canon date are you looking at? 🙂 I believe there are 4 official canons (RC, EO, Coptic & Protestant). I’m happy to affirm the Protestant canon, but what is the date where the canon was affirmed, especially without the OT deutero-canonical books? And I’m going to guess that is connecting with Athanasius’ Paschal Letter in AD 367 or the synod of Hippo in AD 393. So, we’re still seeing such acts after these 2 possible approved dates (though, as I note in the article, many a Protestants will struggle with the comments of Augustine of how these miracles were enacted through relics. Still, I wouldn’t put these things past God.
4) And I’m always going to ask people: Where are we told these gifts are no longer needed once the canon of Scripture is given? I know cessationists usually only recognize the role of these “sign” gifts attesting to the message of the prophets, Jesus and the apostles – and now that we have their message canonized in Scripture, we wouldn’t need these any longer. But I find that hard to establish in Scripture itself and I find it odd that we miss that Scripture tells us these gifts are not only “signs,” but also for edifying/building up the body. I’d say that’s still needed today, as are attesting signs because Scripture doesn’t tell us an affirmed canon does away with these gifts.
5) I am aware of “bad theology”, and I’d agree that some is either unhelpful or outright harmful. However, what if we nice and tidy theological thinkers of the west (and those influenced by the west) are the ones who are wrong? What if they have something to teach us? What if the Belgic, Helvetic Westminster, Baptist, etc, Confessions are problematic? I know it’s hard for us to imagine that. But it’s at least something to ponder as we humbly seek the Infinite One, believing we have a lot to learn from the non-astute and not highly educated. Also, note that God tended to be very happy to use the ones who weren’t the most educated, who weren’t the most neat & tidy in their theology. He used some pretty strange folk at time (though also using the higher ups as well). I think Azusa Street and the revivals following attest to God’s heart to call the weak, the ignoble, the have not’s. And don’t forget that there were some good precursors already taking place before the Pentecostal and charismatic movements – during the Pietist (Wesley) and Great Awakening movements (Edwards).
I hope these provide some helpful thoughts for consideration.
excellent, Scott. Both on the article and the response to Steve. The enormity in numbers and sometimes in scope of miracles being reported are overwhelming. Craig Keener, a top-notch scholar, has a book called “Miracles” you’re probably familiar with detailing healing and miracles in number and depth possibly unsurpassed. I don’t own it, but have read some of it and many reviews.
In this conversation, we must consider the power of prayer. After Jesus’ ascension, and before the Holy Spirit came on the day of Pentecost, we read that Jesus’ disciples and several others “gave themselves all with one accord to continual prayer”. Acts 1:14. In Matthew 18: we read, “if two of you shall agree on earth concerning any matter, it shall come to them from my Father who is in the heavens”. And in James 5:16, we read, “The fervent supplication of the righteous man has much power”. Lastly, in Mark 9:29, concerning the man with the dumb spirit, Jesus says, “This kind can go out by nothing but by prayer and fasting”. (Quotations from Darby translation).